I found this will perusing the wild, less-than-wonderful world of LuLaRoe Failures, and I have to say that I’m not surprised by this. LuLaRoe is refusing refunds due to a “Formstack” glitch and couldn’t care less.
Remember in this article I stated that LuLaRoe was intentionally defrauding retailers by deflating their refund amounts? Now, according to this email, they are also denying refunds to retailers if the items did not appear on the formstacks. Many, many times it’s been mentioned that the formstacks were glitchy and even some of the LuLaRoe home office staff themselves stated that they had glitches in them. So for their failure (yet again) to run a robust enough website to handle the actual traffic, they are going to KEEP YOUR MONEY and not return your goods.
Oh Brave Ones, this is PURE and UTTER bullshit. Someone needs to contact an attorney about this shit and find out if there is more than one instance of this edict coming down from LuLaRoe home office. If so, I see another Class action lawsuit coming.
I am astounded and HORRIFIED at the actions of these people…….JUST GIVE HER THE MONEY! The inventory returners played by the rules that YOU WANTED and now you are going to nickel and dime them to death. I can’t stand this!
Ex-retailers, DO NOT STAND for a penny less than what you are owed. Get it all back. The easier that they see this can be accomplished the more they will do it. Do NOT let this happen! If you have any recordings of Home Office staff stating that the glitches occurred or even emails, please send them my way: lularoefail@gmail.com.
LuLaRoe is refusing refunds due to their system glitch is a heinous and egregious tactic. That’s the lowest of the lowest – but it’s LuLaRoe so what can we expect?
ALL CONTENT QUALIFIES UNDER FAIR USE POLICY.
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
THIS SITE MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL THE USE OF WHICH HAS NOT ALWAYS BEEN SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED BY THE COPYRIGHT OWNER. WE ARE MAKING SUCH MATERIAL AVAILABLE IN AN EFFORT TO ADVANCE UNDERSTANDING OF ENVIRONMENTAL, POLITICAL, HUMAN RIGHTS, ECONOMIC, DEMOCRACY, SCIENTIFIC, MULTI-LEVEL MARKETING, PYRAMID SCHEMES, AND TACTLESS AND INSENSITIVE SELLING METHODS, BLATANTLY HARASSMENT, DISCRIMINATION AND SOCIAL JUSTICE ISSUES, ETC. WE BELIEVE THIS CONSTITUTES A ‘FAIR USE’ OF ANY SUCH COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 107 OF THE US COPYRIGHT LAW.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THE MATERIAL ON THIS SITE IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. FOR MORE INFORMATION GO TO: HTTP://WWW.LAW.CORNELL.EDU/USCODE/17/107.SHTML
IF YOU WISH TO USE COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL FROM THIS SITE FOR PURPOSES OF YOUR OWN THAT GO BEYOND ‘FAIR USE’, YOU MUST OBTAIN PERMISSION FROM THE COPYRIGHT OWNER.
THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES RECOGNIZES A “FAIR USE” OF COPYRIGHTED CONTENT. SECTION 107 OF THE U.S. COPYRIGHT ACT STATES:
“NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 106 AND 106A, THE FAIR USE OF A COPYRIGHTED WORK, INCLUDING SUCH USE BY REPRODUCTION IN COPIES OR PHONORECORDS OR BY ANY OTHER MEANS SPECIFIED BY THAT SECTION, FOR PURPOSES SUCH AS CRITICISM, COMMENT, NEWS REPORTING, TEACHING (INCLUDING MULTIPLE COPIES FOR CLASSROOM USE), SCHOLARSHIP, OR RESEARCH, IS NOT AN INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT.”
THIS BLOG AND MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL, IN GENERAL, MAY CONTAIN CERTAIN COPYRIGHTED WORKS THAT WERE NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED TO BE USED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER(S), BUT WHICH I BELIEVE IN GOOD FAITH ARE PROTECTED BY FEDERAL LAW AND THE FAIR USE DOCTRINE FOR ONE OR MORE OF THE REASONS NOTED ABOVE.