That’s right, you heard me correctly. As of yesterday, LuLaRoe has been calling previous cruise-qualified retailers that have resigned, to come back to the company. Even trying to entice them with the CQ cruise for FREE – can you BELIEVE it?
At least two people have been called of which we are aware. There may be others but I’m not sure. MommyGyver does an in-depth article over on her blog. Go take a peek.
My thoughts on the matter?
The ship is sinking, and QUICK. I have NEVER heard of an MLM company trying to re-recruit people that have left the organization. EVER. This reeks of desperation and I think the end days are near. They are also trying to entice them back with the promise of a “free cruise”! Can you DIG IT?
Instead of actual talking and listening to these retailers on how the company can IMPROVE and increase their retention rate, they are simply offering a free cruise to these people and asking them to “start all over again”.
But what about the crappy prints?
What about the over-saturation and plethora of GOOB sales since rescinding the 100% buyback program that pretty much guarantees that full retail pricing is out the window?
What about the home office LYING to their retailers (of which there were many, many lies)?
What about the recycle and “sanitation” of returned SHITTY prints from retailers that have gone out of business that are being re-curated and shipped back out?
What about them TRYING TO SILENCE those that speak against them?
Noooooooo……let’s not address ANY of those issues! Let’s just try to blind-side them with a SHINY free cruise so that “we can start all over again”. Let’s just keep on keepin’ on.
LuLaRoe will never learn. Mark & DeAnne are so far removed from reality and how to run a retail business that at this point, revamping the company and business model would do no good. They’ve burned THOUSANDS of bridges with both retailers and customers.
“The damage has been done, and we’re too far gone to get over it.”
ALL CONTENT QUALIFIES UNDER FAIR USE POLICY.
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
THIS SITE MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL THE USE OF WHICH HAS NOT ALWAYS BEEN SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED BY THE COPYRIGHT OWNER. WE ARE MAKING SUCH MATERIAL AVAILABLE IN AN EFFORT TO ADVANCE UNDERSTANDING OF ENVIRONMENTAL, POLITICAL, HUMAN RIGHTS, ECONOMIC, DEMOCRACY, SCIENTIFIC, MULTI-LEVEL MARKETING, PYRAMID SCHEMES, AND TACTLESS AND INSENSITIVE SELLING METHODS, BLATANTLY HARASSMENT, DISCRIMINATION AND SOCIAL JUSTICE ISSUES, ETC. WE BELIEVE THIS CONSTITUTES A ‘FAIR USE’ OF ANY SUCH COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 107 OF THE US COPYRIGHT LAW.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THE MATERIAL ON THIS SITE IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. FOR MORE INFORMATION GO TO: HTTP://WWW.LAW.CORNELL.EDU/USCODE/17/107.SHTML
IF YOU WISH TO USE COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL FROM THIS SITE FOR PURPOSES OF YOUR OWN THAT GO BEYOND ‘FAIR USE’, YOU MUST OBTAIN PERMISSION FROM THE COPYRIGHT OWNER.
THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES RECOGNIZES A “FAIR USE” OF COPYRIGHTED CONTENT. SECTION 107 OF THE U.S. COPYRIGHT ACT STATES:
“NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 106 AND 106A, THE FAIR USE OF A COPYRIGHTED WORK, INCLUDING SUCH USE BY REPRODUCTION IN COPIES OR PHONORECORDS OR BY ANY OTHER MEANS SPECIFIED BY THAT SECTION, FOR PURPOSES SUCH AS CRITICISM, COMMENT, NEWS REPORTING, TEACHING (INCLUDING MULTIPLE COPIES FOR CLASSROOM USE), SCHOLARSHIP, OR RESEARCH, IS NOT AN INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT.”
THIS BLOG AND MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL, IN GENERAL, MAY CONTAIN CERTAIN COPYRIGHTED WORKS THAT WERE NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED TO BE USED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER(S), BUT WHICH I BELIEVE IN GOOD FAITH ARE PROTECTED BY FEDERAL LAW AND THE FAIR USE DOCTRINE FOR ONE OR MORE OF THE REASONS NOTED ABOVE.