LuLaRoe Pro……you mad?

Patrick Winget Is not happy about the backlash he’s getting in Instagram because of his extremely poor design choices for this year’s holiday capsule collection. So, LuLaRoe Pro……you mad?

LuLaRoe Pro......you mad?
In an all time HIGH in hubris, LuLaRoe decided to allow Patrick to design the holiday capsule collections with the faces of himself, as well as the Layered One, DeAnne Sitdham. Looks like the feedback on IG is not in his favor – and I know it’s definitely not in his favor on Facebook. Here’s just a couple of the designs.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

It’s been said for quite some time now that LuLaRoe designs for consultants, because they are the majority of people buy at retail or keep items that come in their boxes from the warehouse. This solidifies this opinion.

Why in the WORLD would anyone, besides a LuLaRoe retailer, want to wear these people on their bodies? And of course I especially want DeAnne poking her head out right above my vagina – I STRIVE for that. Oh, and these prints? They’re up on wholesale pages already. Non-retailers have no idea who these people are and certainly don’t want to wear them on their bodies. The capsule just released on Tuesday so the earliest that they could have been received is Wednesday or Thursday. And they’re up for wholesale already.

Just about the only thing I would use these print for was to wipe my ass. This truly shows that the LuLaRoe Home Office staff, headed by DeAnne, thinks that they are rock stars and feel that putting their faces on products is justified. It’s very rare that I would wear a piece of clothing with a person’s face on it; if I did it would have to be Albert Einstein or Nikola Tesla. I have mad respect for those people. But Patrick & DeAnne? That’s a hard no.

Can we also address the absolutely horrid grammar in most home office communiques? They tout themselves as a multi-million dollar company and yet have grammar of a three year old, at times. This is not putting your best face forward (Get it? Face? I crack myself up).

The shit storm that has now become LuLaRoe is a train soon to leave its rails. So many lawsuits – I’d love to see one regarding designs being unsaleable or strictly created for the retailer-only market. I bet it’s coming.

But……but…….LuLaRoe Pro……you mad?

ALL CONTENT QUALIFIES UNDER FAIR USE POLICY.

FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:

THIS SITE MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL THE USE OF WHICH HAS NOT ALWAYS BEEN SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED BY THE COPYRIGHT OWNER. WE ARE MAKING SUCH MATERIAL AVAILABLE IN AN EFFORT TO ADVANCE UNDERSTANDING OF ENVIRONMENTAL, POLITICAL, HUMAN RIGHTS, ECONOMIC, DEMOCRACY, SCIENTIFIC, MULTI-LEVEL MARKETING, PYRAMID SCHEMES, AND TACTLESS AND INSENSITIVE SELLING METHODS, BLATANTLY HARASSMENT, DISCRIMINATION AND SOCIAL JUSTICE ISSUES, ETC. WE BELIEVE THIS CONSTITUTES A ‘FAIR USE’ OF ANY SUCH COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 107 OF THE US COPYRIGHT LAW.

IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THE MATERIAL ON THIS SITE IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. FOR MORE INFORMATION GO TO: HTTP://WWW.LAW.CORNELL.EDU/USCODE/17/107.SHTML

IF YOU WISH TO USE COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL FROM THIS SITE FOR PURPOSES OF YOUR OWN THAT GO BEYOND ‘FAIR USE’, YOU MUST OBTAIN PERMISSION FROM THE COPYRIGHT OWNER.

THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES RECOGNIZES A “FAIR USE” OF COPYRIGHTED CONTENT. SECTION 107 OF THE U.S. COPYRIGHT ACT STATES:

“NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 106 AND 106A, THE FAIR USE OF A COPYRIGHTED WORK, INCLUDING SUCH USE BY REPRODUCTION IN COPIES OR PHONORECORDS OR BY ANY OTHER MEANS SPECIFIED BY THAT SECTION, FOR PURPOSES SUCH AS CRITICISM, COMMENT, NEWS REPORTING, TEACHING (INCLUDING MULTIPLE COPIES FOR CLASSROOM USE), SCHOLARSHIP, OR RESEARCH, IS NOT AN INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT.”

THIS BLOG AND MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL, IN GENERAL, MAY CONTAIN CERTAIN COPYRIGHTED WORKS THAT WERE NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED TO BE USED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER(S), BUT WHICH I BELIEVE IN GOOD FAITH ARE PROTECTED BY FEDERAL LAW AND THE FAIR USE DOCTRINE FOR ONE OR MORE OF THE REASONS NOTED ABOVE.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.